rude_rumps Posted April 29, 2019 Share Posted April 29, 2019 I noticed there are some fellow old movie lovers on here!! So here's a little illustration I did... I imagine the starlet is kind of a Judy Garland type about 19 or so and there's a scene at the end where she gets her comeuppance from the dashing leading man. But she's not 'showing enough emotion' so the director tells the actor to lift her skirt and spank her for real.. 7 2 Link to comment
Needsitbad Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Love It! The undergarments look a little modern to me but I'm no expert in the history of ladies clothing ☺ Link to comment
dmirk Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 I love this! Great work. Feel free to send me the panties down colorized version... There are some classic spanking scenes in old movies and TV Westerns. Link to comment
spike Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Always loved the classic movies with spanking. Remember watching some as a kid, glued to the television, hoping no one else in the house would walk into the room. Link to comment
ukspanko Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 I can just imagine the dialogue "How dare you ! You can't spank me. I'm a famous actress !" "I can't spank you hey ? We'll see about that you spoiled brat .... Link to comment
FirmHandDisciplineNC Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 You do some excellent work! She looks like she's learning one of life's difficult lessons right about now. Link to comment
rude_rumps Posted May 1, 2019 Author Share Posted May 1, 2019 I'm glad classic movies and spankings are popular here!! It seems there's questions about the authenticity of the panties...so perhaps she'd be better off without them? And maybe she'd look better in Technicolor AND without the panties? This gives me some ideas for the next one lol... 2 Link to comment
dmirk Posted May 1, 2019 Share Posted May 1, 2019 1 hour ago, rude_rumps said: I'm glad classic movies and spankings are popular here!! It seems there's questions about the authenticity of the panties...so perhaps she'd be better off without them? And maybe she'd look better in Technicolor AND without the panties? This gives me some ideas for the next one lol... Oh, good! Normally I like black and white a lot, but if the panties are coming down... Link to comment
AssuredlyAbsent Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I know you say this girl is 19 but that isn't what I'm seeing. She appears to be much closer to 12 than 19 in my opinion. Perhaps that wasn't the intent but that's my take. I think what bothers me most is that there have been requests for a panties down version of what appears to be an underage girl. 1 Link to comment
sassylittle Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I agree with Mr FF... she kinda looks a lot younger than 19. I' m sure people don' t want to be seen as a bunch of pervs. 1 Link to comment
rude_rumps Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 34 minutes ago, FinallyFree said: I know you say this girl is 19 but that isn't what I'm seeing. She appears to be much closer to 12 than 19 in my opinion. Perhaps that wasn't the intent but that's my take. I think what bothers me most is that there have been requests for a panties down version of what appears to be an underage girl. She's an adult...look at how tall she is in comparison to the actor and the muscular development in her bottom and legs. I was trying to illustrate the type of style in old movies and a kind of fresh-faced starlet. I'm sorry if it appears to be anything else to you. Link to comment
Redandmore Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I agree with you Rude. She does appear to be an adult. The SpankER's hand and the SpankEE's left buttock, which he is about to spank, seems proportional to an older woman. Maybe even older than 19! The woman seems to be trying to discuss something with the man holding the rifle. Link to comment
AssuredlyAbsent Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I was referring to the first picture. The second picture seems perfectly fine to me. Link to comment
rude_rumps Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 39 minutes ago, FinallyFree said: I was referring to the first picture. The second picture seems perfectly fine to me. The first picture is my own artwork. She's meant to be a 19-year-old starlet. I'm sorry if it appears anything otherwise. I won't post my artwork if people are bothered by it or don't like it. I don't like to argue with people and get very upset by that so I'll go away if that's easier. Sorry. Link to comment
rude_rumps Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Spankbadgirl said: I agree with Mr FF... she kinda looks a lot younger than 19. I' m sure people don' t want to be seen as a bunch of pervs. I turned 50 last year and have literally kept my spanking interests hidden (except for some of my intimate partners) for more than 40 years. I only 'came out' online about a month ago...the first time I'd talked about this was strangers ever. The reason I didn't do so before was because of fear...one of my greatest fears my whole life (that's happening here now) is being publicly called a pervert because of my interests. It brings back all the shame and fear of living with this and realizing how unacceptable my interests are to most people. I hoped to find acceptance but am not finding that unfortunately Link to comment
AssuredlyAbsent Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I was simply stating my opinion of how the picture appeared to me and it appears that she is underage in my eyes. I'm not arguing, it's only my opinion. And while I can't speak for SpankedBadGirl I took her perv comment to be directed at the idea of wanting to see a panties down version, but maybe I'm wrong. This was not an attack on you or your work on my part but I do think it's running the razor's edge of breaking the site rules. Link to comment
rude_rumps Posted May 9, 2019 Author Share Posted May 9, 2019 27 minutes ago, FinallyFree said: I was simply stating my opinion of how the picture appeared to me and it appears that she is underage in my eyes. I'm not arguing, it's only my opinion. And while I can't speak for SpankedBadGirl I took her perv comment to be directed at the idea of wanting to see a panties down version, but maybe I'm wrong. This was not an attack on you or your work on my part but I do think it's running the razor's edge of breaking the site rules. Sorry...I'm just having a very strong reaction...feeling rejected and vulnerable. I won't post anymore and bother you. Link to comment
sassylittle Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 The perv comment was directed at the men who wanted to see what seemed like an underage girl, to me, with her panties down. Not directed at you, Rude- rumps. There is no shame in having spanking interests at all and you are taking our comments out of context. No- one meant to hurt your feelings and I am sorry that you feel that way. Don' t let comments on a pic put you off. Link to comment
Sadie Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 I will say that I have only scanned the comments here. But I see nothing wrong with the art work, here. The OP (artist) stated that the girl was a On 4/29/2019 at 7:43 PM, rude_rumps said: Judy Garland type about 19 or so therefore the piece should be completely acceptable. In terms of the panties-down comment I have the same reaction toward the person who posted that (NOT the person who drew the picture) but on the flip side of that the girl in the picture IS wearing Wizard of Oz-type costuming and Dorothy Gale WAS meant to be 12 (consider the fact that Shirley Temple, who is younger than Garland, was also up for the role). BUT it was popular then to use adult actors to play teenaged roles AND the girl has Garland's features. Link to comment
AssuredlyAbsent Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 "Posting of images real or fictional, of Children or depicting CP of Children is not permitted anywhere on this site. Continued violations of these rules will result in a person being removed from the site. The term(s) Child/Children refers to anyone under the age of 18. This is intended to clarify what has been stated within the Rules of this site. " I respectfully disagree that just because the stated age is 19 that everything is fine. To me she looks much younger than that and the fact that a grown man requested a panties down version of a picture that to me is depicting the spanking of a 12 year old girl is very concerning. But it also appears that my opinion is in the minority here so maybe it's time for me to move on since voicing my opinion on one picture has seemingly now been carried over into new threads. Link to comment
dmirk Posted May 15, 2019 Share Posted May 15, 2019 On 5/9/2019 at 1:49 PM, rude_rumps said: Sorry...I'm just having a very strong reaction...feeling rejected and vulnerable. I won't post anymore and bother you. Oh, please do post more. I believe a good majority of us are with you. Link to comment
Sadie Posted May 16, 2019 Share Posted May 16, 2019 19 hours ago, FinallyFree said: I respectfully disagree that just because the stated age is 19 that everything is fine. To me she looks much younger than that and the fact that a grown man requested a panties down version of a picture that to me is depicting the spanking of a 12 year old girl is very concerning. I would say that, of course the girl looks younger than 19 -- she was playing a 12yo! Again, look at the costuming of the girl and the facial features. She is SUPPOSED to be Judy Garland , who was not 12 when she was in the Wizard Of OZ! (I would feel very differently toward this if it were an original character that we could not prove was "of age" during the intended time period given, btw. Just in case anyone would like to call my own morality into question.) The OP is not responsible for how others respond to her posts, nor should she be made to feel responsible. We are all adults and therefore all responsible for our OWN words and actions. 2 Link to comment
AssuredlyAbsent Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 The rules plainly state that depictions of child spanking are not allowed. To me, and others, the pictures appears to be an underage girl. Grown men asking to see a panties down picture, real or created, bothers me greatly. I certainly wouldn't trust them near my own underage daughter. That was my issue with the picture. Also, of course it matters how something is perceived by others. If I drew a picture of a tree shaped like a penis and everyone said "hey that's a penis and pictures of penises are against the rules" am I right to say, "no it's not a penis,it's a tree and how you perceive it is of no consequence"? Of course not. People have differing opinions, am I not entitled to mine that the girl appears to be underage? Because she certainly does and no amount of justification can change that fact. 1 Link to comment
sassylittle Posted May 21, 2019 Share Posted May 21, 2019 2 hours ago, FinallyFree said: The rules plainly state that depictions of child spanking are not allowed. To me, and others, the pictures appears to be an underage girl. Grown men asking to see a panties down picture, real or created, bothers me greatly. I certainly wouldn't trust them near my own underage daughter. That was my issue with the picture. Also, of course it matters how something is perceived by others. If I drew a picture of a tree shaped like a penis and everyone said "hey that's a penis and pictures of penises are against the rules" am I right to say, "no it's not a penis,it's a tree and how you perceive it is of no consequence"? Of course not. People have differing opinions, am I not entitled to mine that the girl appears to be underage? Because she certainly does and no amount of justification can change that fact. I have always wondered what a " penis tree" looks like... This little girl drew Mrs FF a pic of a house and a corvette to go with it earlier so i think you owe me a picture of a " penis tree" If it doesn' t match my expectations beware this little girl stomps her feet and has tantrums so make it good Mrs FF Link to comment
Recommended Posts