Jump to content
Spanking Needs Forums

Pictures?


Recommended Posts

I notice not many or no one maybe, posts any pictures of themselves of their spankees here. I was wondering if that was a general rule or just people's preference. I wanted to post some bottoms I've warmed but was unsure if I should.

  • Like 3
Link to post

There is no general rule against that as long as you have that person's consent written that you can prove so that if it gets contested you don't get in trouble for it. And don't post pictures of anyone's faces regardless except your own if you want to.

Link to post
4 hours ago, bustod said:

I'd say just people's choice to remain discreet, never know what someone digs up in a background check when you apply for a job somewhere.

Just a thought, but in a doing a background check is there some sort of ass recognition software available now or even a database to check against as I'm not sure of the logic to this coming into play since names would not be listed. I am still learning so please if I'm wrong, please explain...

  • Like 2
Link to post

It all depends on what information you reveal or picture you share, ass recognition - may be not, so could be safe, face recognition is a google search nowadays, in case you didn't know or realize.

I made a generalized statement. I did not mention exactly what is or will be shared, did I ? That is the person's own choice.

If you're smart enough to not have any of your professional info linked to your spanking profiles, you're really not revealing much, but if you are posting under your real life name or a real life face pic, or some chain of evidence loose out there links the pieces together, then you can decide for yourself whether or not a future employer might (or not) judge you for that. If not, great.

To summarize, ass pics are unlikely to cause much harm unless some one who knows the ass finds it randomly :)
 

Link to post

Just FYI, someone on here once expressed skepticism about how much personal information could be gleaned about them from an email address they thought was linked only to their SN account, so I accepted the challenge. Within an hour, I had their real name, family members' names, professional license number, home address, previous addresses, and a partial work history (all of which they received in an anonymous Christmas card mailed to their home). Photos are just as easy to identify if they've been published anywhere else on the interwebs. Luckily, I am not malevolent or out to injure anyone, but there are certainly some creeps and crazies who could wreak havoc on your life if you reveal too much. So my recommendation is to always err on the side of caution with any digital information you share, especially things like pictures, email addresses, and social media links. Also, NEVER post a pic of someone else (or their body parts) without their express consent -- that's just plain unethical, and may even subject them to unanticipated consequences.

There are several people on here who post pics of their EEs' butts after a spanking, and it always makes me cringe. While it's not expressly against the site rules if no genitalia is exposed, I always wonder if the EE gave consent for that.

My two cents ...

  • Like 9
Link to post

If you are attaching pictures you might want to look up how to remove image metadata. A lot of forum gallery software will resample pictures and remove it (like PhotoShop does when set to certain publishing modes) but adding them as attachments is a different matter.

The likelihood of it being useful to trace someone is low but I do recall reading about cases where images have contained accurate GPS coordinates :).

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Guest Redmoons17

Are you referring to face pics to profile or red bottom spanking pics?  I would be glad to oblige in the latter or if I get to know you the previous.

 

Link to post
22 minutes ago, Redmoons17 said:

Are you referring to face pics to profile or red bottom spanking pics?  I would be glad to oblige in the latter or if I get to know you the previous.

 

Just bottoms! And I'm on fetlife where I post pics of them (and myself) so I guess I didn't really think that much of it. This forum seems very hush hush about it.

  • Like 1
Link to post

Just to help clarify a few questions, here is a copy of the Rules as they pertain to photos:

Limited Nudity in Photos

As for nudity, in the past there was a ban on anything nude but this has been altered. After thinking about it we see no reason appropriate spanking pictures shouldn't be allowed on your profiles in moderation.

 

These are the guidelines for that.

  1. First and foremost, NO CHILDREN BEING SPANKED CAN BE SHOWN WHATSOEVER!!!
  2. Nude bottoms may be shown as it pertains to spanking only.
  3. No graphic nudity will be permitted and by that I mean anything where genitalia is showing whether male or female. This is for spanking so if there are whole naked bodies even shown from the back that is too much nudity. Bottoms only and only in the context of spanking. All others will be removed. This is an adult spanking site and some photos depicting that are appropriate on this site and we do not deem them pornographic. If anything inappropriate is shown a PM will be sent and if you do not comply with the PM it will be removed by one of the moderators.
  • Like 2
Link to post

I prefer the rules here, especially the ones pertaining to nudity. It keeps this a spanking site and not a mainstream fetish site. I've seen a few things on Fetlife that I hope to never see again.

  • Like 4
Link to post

A "purely" spanking site is not easy to find. Most of the kink sites we see, it will be a mix of all the fetishes..bondage, spanking,BDSM,CFMN etc .....But this is "pure" spanking site, a unique one. So, if there are going to be pictures which are pertaining to boundaries other than this site covers, it does not follow the etiquette of the site. So, it is only logical to have profile pics related to spanking or something else in general. But a "non-spanking" but "kinky" pic, is not much advisable for this site.

Link to post

sjmme - I am on Fetlife as well as Spanknutt and I have plenty of red bottoms posted there, including a couple of videos (love your heart-shaped paddle, mine broke).  I have posted pics here from time to time, although I don't see anywhere on my profile for a gallery.  But hey, since you asked, this one is from last week....

001A.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post

I'm all for posting real photos of real spankings, corner time, etc. BUT: My concern is that many folks will start posting photos of models and movie actresses. Which I consider to be porn.

Without facial features, identifying porn photos will be nigh impossible.

I think the best solution is for friends who know each other to share photos confidentially. The photos will be more apt to be real.

There are millions of porn photos of models and actresses online. We dont need any more.

(Just for the record, I welcome real friends sharing real photos confidentially.) Nothing is as pretty as a (real) well spanked young lady! :wub:

 

 

Link to post
1 hour ago, Spanknutt said:

sjmme - I aSir Fetlife as well as Spankn. utt and I have plenty of red bottoms posted there, including a couple of videos (love your heart-shaped paddle, mine broke).  I have posted pics here from time to time, although I don't see anywhere on my profile for a gallery.  But hey, since you asked, this one is from last week....

001A.jpg

Hi Spanknutt. Very very nice! :)  Thank you Sir. We should probably have a forum devoted to photos, no?

Link to post

Posting appropriate pictures, and topics is a sign of respect you should towards the "purpose" of the site. We need to be thankful for having such a site to access, to explore our needs. It's completely non-ethical when we try to do things which the site clearly discourages. This is a spanking site, so what's the need to put a nude pic? A bare bottom pic would suffice. It's better to have no profile rather than to have unethical profile pics. There are so many things you can choose as your avatar. Choose anything, but leave the nudity( except for the bare bottom ), out of it. 

Maybe if this was a Femdom site or BDSM site, the nudity pics will be acceptable. But for this one, it's just spoiling the site's rules. The site was found for spanking, let's just keep "everything" around spanking, and not try to broaden the aspects of the site.

Link to post

My position on the picture posting issue is "let's not go there".  We all have fertile imaginations.  Let's use them. Plus, a reddened ass, is just a reddened ass, is just a reddened ass...and a black and blue bruised and rumpled ass is just repellent. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
9 hours ago, LadySiF said:

A "purely" spanking site is not easy to find. Most of the kink sites we see, it will be a mix of all the fetishes..bondage, spanking,BDSM,CFMN etc .....But this is "pure" spanking site, a unique one. So, if there are going to be pictures which are pertaining to boundaries other than this site covers, it does not follow the etiquette of the site. So, it is only logical to have profile pics related to spanking or something else in general. But a "non-spanking" but "kinky" pic, is not much advisable for this site.

Quite, which is why my avatar is what it is- connected clearly to my position as 'spankee':)

  • Like 2
Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you all for the input! I'll keep my photos to fetlife even though they're mostly just red bottoms! Feel free to find me there as Sjmme!

  • Like 1
Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...